Share Are there plans to have active transportation considered in the residential and commercial development planning protocols - Seems developers propose a subdivision and then folks have to ask council to consider bike and walking paths. If the requirement for developers was to include active transportation in their original submissions to planning then it can only be easier and cheaper to get them implemented. on Facebook
Share Are there plans to have active transportation considered in the residential and commercial development planning protocols - Seems developers propose a subdivision and then folks have to ask council to consider bike and walking paths. If the requirement for developers was to include active transportation in their original submissions to planning then it can only be easier and cheaper to get them implemented. on X (formerly Twitter)
Share Are there plans to have active transportation considered in the residential and commercial development planning protocols - Seems developers propose a subdivision and then folks have to ask council to consider bike and walking paths. If the requirement for developers was to include active transportation in their original submissions to planning then it can only be easier and cheaper to get them implemented. on Linkedin
Email Are there plans to have active transportation considered in the residential and commercial development planning protocols - Seems developers propose a subdivision and then folks have to ask council to consider bike and walking paths. If the requirement for developers was to include active transportation in their original submissions to planning then it can only be easier and cheaper to get them implemented. link
Are there plans to have active transportation considered in the residential and commercial development planning protocols - Seems developers propose a subdivision and then folks have to ask council to consider bike and walking paths. If the requirement for developers was to include active transportation in their original submissions to planning then it can only be easier and cheaper to get them implemented.
The outlier
asked
over 5 years ago
The Provincial and Oxford County Official Plan policies both identify support for active transportation as one of the many considerations that are looked at when reviewing development proposals. The Oxford County Cycling Master Plan (CMP) focuses primarily on County-owned roads. The CMP would help to inform the review of active transportation needs and considerations in future planning/development review processes that involve County roads and corridors. The review of active transportation considerations for local municipal roads and other facilities (e.g. parks, trails etc.) and on-site supports for active transportation (e.g. as part of commercial development) would be primarily informed by each local municipality’s master plans, guidelines and standards, which vary from municipality to municipality.
More detailed information about how active transportation-related matters are considered in a particular area municipality in Oxford County can be obtained through the assigned County planner for each municipality. Contact information for each planner can be found on the Oxford County website: https://www.oxfordcounty.ca/Business-in-Oxford/Planning-and-Development/Contact-a-Planner.
Share I participated in the survey, today (Feb 9), shocked (? ... certainly surprised) to read that Culloden Rd. and Hwy. 59 were being used as cycling "routes". A "route", to my understanding, is a roadway predominantly used by motor vehicles with a secondary purpose, in this case, for cyclists to follow...without any extra accommodations. Is my interpretation incorrect? As a supplementary question, even if I am mistaken, why would these roadways have been selected for cyclists to be associated with? From my own perspective, and that of the cyclists I ride with, avoiding heavy traffic roadways, even if a dedicated bike lane was available, would be a priority. We cycle for the peace, quiet, and serenity found along less traveled routes. What cyclist seeks out the routes that have the most semi's, pickups, and farm implements being driven along it? Thank you for considering these questions. on Facebook
Share I participated in the survey, today (Feb 9), shocked (? ... certainly surprised) to read that Culloden Rd. and Hwy. 59 were being used as cycling "routes". A "route", to my understanding, is a roadway predominantly used by motor vehicles with a secondary purpose, in this case, for cyclists to follow...without any extra accommodations. Is my interpretation incorrect? As a supplementary question, even if I am mistaken, why would these roadways have been selected for cyclists to be associated with? From my own perspective, and that of the cyclists I ride with, avoiding heavy traffic roadways, even if a dedicated bike lane was available, would be a priority. We cycle for the peace, quiet, and serenity found along less traveled routes. What cyclist seeks out the routes that have the most semi's, pickups, and farm implements being driven along it? Thank you for considering these questions. on X (formerly Twitter)
Share I participated in the survey, today (Feb 9), shocked (? ... certainly surprised) to read that Culloden Rd. and Hwy. 59 were being used as cycling "routes". A "route", to my understanding, is a roadway predominantly used by motor vehicles with a secondary purpose, in this case, for cyclists to follow...without any extra accommodations. Is my interpretation incorrect? As a supplementary question, even if I am mistaken, why would these roadways have been selected for cyclists to be associated with? From my own perspective, and that of the cyclists I ride with, avoiding heavy traffic roadways, even if a dedicated bike lane was available, would be a priority. We cycle for the peace, quiet, and serenity found along less traveled routes. What cyclist seeks out the routes that have the most semi's, pickups, and farm implements being driven along it? Thank you for considering these questions. on Linkedin
Email I participated in the survey, today (Feb 9), shocked (? ... certainly surprised) to read that Culloden Rd. and Hwy. 59 were being used as cycling "routes". A "route", to my understanding, is a roadway predominantly used by motor vehicles with a secondary purpose, in this case, for cyclists to follow...without any extra accommodations. Is my interpretation incorrect? As a supplementary question, even if I am mistaken, why would these roadways have been selected for cyclists to be associated with? From my own perspective, and that of the cyclists I ride with, avoiding heavy traffic roadways, even if a dedicated bike lane was available, would be a priority. We cycle for the peace, quiet, and serenity found along less traveled routes. What cyclist seeks out the routes that have the most semi's, pickups, and farm implements being driven along it? Thank you for considering these questions. link
I participated in the survey, today (Feb 9), shocked (? ... certainly surprised) to read that Culloden Rd. and Hwy. 59 were being used as cycling "routes". A "route", to my understanding, is a roadway predominantly used by motor vehicles with a secondary purpose, in this case, for cyclists to follow...without any extra accommodations. Is my interpretation incorrect? As a supplementary question, even if I am mistaken, why would these roadways have been selected for cyclists to be associated with? From my own perspective, and that of the cyclists I ride with, avoiding heavy traffic roadways, even if a dedicated bike lane was available, would be a priority. We cycle for the peace, quiet, and serenity found along less traveled routes. What cyclist seeks out the routes that have the most semi's, pickups, and farm implements being driven along it? Thank you for considering these questions.
B Hos
asked
over 5 years ago
We recognize that County roads typically have higher traffic volumes including large trucks and farm equipment which can pose a greater risk for cyclists. The objective of the Oxford County Cycling Master Plan (CMP) is to identify primary cycling routes on County-owned roads that provide the greatest connectivity to communities, off-road trails, tourism destinations, employment areas, and to more preferred local roads with lower traffic volumes. The implementation of cycling routes on the proposed primary network would include designated bike lanes with a degree of buffering and separation (pavement markings, rumble strips, flexible bollards, etc.) for improved safety for all road users. The options would be further evaluated when specific cycling infrastructure projects (informed by the CMP) are initiated.